Much social organization no longer fits
the standard sociological model of a world composed of nested groups. Work,
community and domesticity have moved from hierarchically arranged, densely
knit, bounded groups to social networks. In networked
societies, boundaries are more permeable, interactions are with diverse others,
linkages switch between multiple networks, and hierarchies are flatter and more
recursive. Hence many people and organizations communicate with others in ways
that ramify across group boundaries. Rather than relating to one group, they
cycle through interactions with a variety of others, at work or in the
community. Their work and community networks are diffuse and sparsely knit,
with vague, overlapping, social and spatial boundaries. Their computer-mediated
communication has become part of their everyday lives, rather than being a
separate set of relationships.
Social network analysis is a way to
understand fundamental social questions.
Network analysts study the relations linking persons, organizations,
interest groups, states, etc. They
analyze the structure of these relations, and they study how such structures
allocate scarce resources, constrain behaviour, and channel social change. Their methods are both quantitative and
qualitative.
This course discusses the application of the
concepts and methods of network analysis to sociological questions. It focuses on open, unbounded systems -- be
they communities or sets of nations. No
previous experience is necessary.
Among the
questions we examine are:
· Why supportive communities have
flourished in the teeth of urbanization, bureaucratization, capitalism,
socialism, industrialization and technological change?
· In what ways do computer
networks become social networks? What kinds of social structures and activities
take place on computer supported social networks?
· How do networks organize
collective political activity, non-violent and violent?
· How do interlocking corporate
and government ties operate in formal bureaucracies, link ruling elites, and
organize large-scale social structures?
· How do relations of power and
dependency structure world systems?
*UTL = http://www.library.utoronto.ca/
*GN05 = http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/~wellman/gradnet05/
Presentations 10%
On a reading (content, depth, organization, visual aids, clarity]
Participation 10%
[thoughtfulness, originality, activity]
Reaction Papers 10% Two page paper for each class, discussing
a reading
Paper Proposal 6% [statement of
problem, state of art on problem;
research design; 5 pp.]. Due March 8
Term Paper Term
papers should combine literature review & original research
25% of the paper grade will be based on the first draft. Due April 25
40% on the final paper. Due May 4.
Barry Wellman & S.D. Berkowitz, eds., Social
Structures: A Network Approach (Canadian Scholars Press – or older editions)
Barry Wellman,
ed., Networks in the Global Village
(Westview Press)
Nan Lin, Karen
Cook and Ronald Burt, Social Capital:
Theory and Research (Aldine de Gruyter)
John Scott: Social Network Analysis (Sage)
David Knoke &
John Kuklinski, Social Network Analysis (Sage)
Nan Lin, Social Capital (Cambridge University
Press)
Robert Putnam, Bowling Alone (Simon and Schuster)
Manuel Castells, The Rise of the Network Society, second
edition (Blackwell)
Stanley Wasserman
and Katherine Faust, Social Network
Analysis (Cambridge University Press)
Barry Wellman
& Caroline Haythornthwaite, eds., The Internet in Everyday Life (Blackwell).
Course Outline
1. CONCEPTS (Jan 4)
*Barry Wellman,
"Structural Analysis: From Method
& Metaphor to Theory & Substance." In Wellman & Berkowitz.
http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/~wellman/publications/structuralanalysis/structanaly.pdf
Barry Wellman,
"An Electronic Group is Virtually a Social Network" In Sara Kiesler, Culture of the Internet (1997).
http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/~wellman/publications/electronicgroup/electronicgroup.pdf
David Tindall and
Barry Wellman, “Canada as Social Structure: Social Network Analysis and
Canadian Sociology.” Special issue on “The Legacy of Canadian Sociology,”
edited by Harry Hiller. Canadian Journal
of Sociology 26 (3), Fall, 2001: 265- 308. UTL
2. CLASSICAL STATEMENTS (Jan 11)
Georg Simmel,
"The Web of Group Affiliations" in Conflict And The Web Of Group Affiliations. Glencoe:
Free Press, 1955 GN05
J.A. Barnes,
"Classes and Committees in A Norwegian Island Parish" in Samuel
Leinhardt, ed., Social Networks: A Developing Paradigm. GN05
Elizabeth Bott,
"Urban Families: Conjugal Roles
and Social Networks," in Leinhardt. GN05
Harrison White,
Scott Boorman and Ronald Breiger. 1976. "Social Structure from Multiple
Networks: I Blockmodels of Roles and Positions." American Journal of
Sociology 81: 730-80. UTL
3. THE IMPACT OF SOCIAL STRUCTURE ON PROCESS (Jan 18)
Mark Granovetter,
“The Strength of Weak Ties,” American Journal of Sociology, 1973,
coupled with: Mark Granovetter, "Weak Ties Revisited" in Sociological Theory 1983, edited by
Randall Collins. UTL
Scott Feld, “The
Focused Organization of Social Ties,” American
Journal of Sociology 86. UTL
Ronald Breiger,
"The Duality of Persons & Groups," Pp. 83-98 in Wellman &
Berkowitz.
GN05
Linton Freeman.
1979. "Centrality in Social Networks: Conceptual Clarification." Social
Networks 1: 215-39. UTL
4. SOCIAL CAPITAL (Jan 25)
Nan Lin. 2005. “A
Network Theory of Social Capital.” Forthcoming in Handbook of Social
Capital, edited by Jan van Deth and Guglielmo Wolleb GN05
Bonnie Erickson,
"Good Networks and Good Jobs." In Lin, Cook and Burt.. GN05
Alejandro Portes
and Patricia Landolt. 1996. The Downside of Social Capital. The American Prospect 26:18-21. UTL
Karen Cook, 2004. “Networks, Norms and Trust: The Social Psychology of Social Capital.” Presented to the International Conference on Social Capital, Taiwan, December. GN05
Gabriele Plickert,
Barry Wellman and Rochelle Coté, 2005.
“Tit for Tat and all That.” Forthcoming in Social Capital on the Ground, edited by Talja Blokland and Mike Savage. Oxford
Blackwell.
5. COMMUNITY AND SOCIAL CAPITAL (Feb 1)
Barry Wellman
& Scot Wortley, "Different Strokes from Different Folks," American Journal of Sociology 96,
11/90. UTL
Barry Wellman and
Kenneth Frank, "Network Capital in a Multilevel World." Pp. 233-4 in
Lin, Cook & Burt.
http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/~wellman/publications/networkcapital/hlmnan10.pdf
Peter Marsden.
1987"Core Discussion Networks of Americans," American Sociological Review 52 (February): 122-31. UTL
Barry Wellman,
"Physical Place and Cyber Place: The Rise of Personalized Networking"
International Journal of Urban and
Regional Research 25, 2 (2001): 227-52.
UTL
Endre Sik and
Barry Wellman. 1999. "Network Capital in Capitalist, Communist, and
Postcommunist Countries." Pp. 225-254 in Networks in the Global Village, edited by Wellman. GN05
Alexis Ferrand,
Lise Mounier and Alain Degenne. 1999. "The Diversity of Personal Networks
in France: Social Stratification and Relational Structures." Pp. 185-224
in Networks in the Global Village,
edited by Wellman. GN05
6. SEARCH AND DIFFUSION PROCESSES (Feb 8)
Stanley Milgram, "The Small-World Problem," Psychology Today
1 (3/67): 62-67.
H. Russell
Bernard, Gene Ann Shelley and Peter Killworth. 1987. "How Much of a
Network does the GSS and RSW Dredge Up?" Social Networks 9 (March):49-63.
Thomas Valente, Network Models of the Diffusion of
Innovations, Chapters 3 & 4.
Miller McPherson, Lynn Smith-Lovin and James Cook, “Birds of a Feather:
Homophily in Social Networks.” Annual Review of
Sociology 27 (2001): 415-44. UTL
Duncan Watts. 2003. Six Degrees: The Science of a Connected Age. New York: W.W. Norton.
selections
Albert-Laszlo Barabasi & Eric Bonabeau. 2003. "Scale-Free
Networks." Scientific American, May, 60-69. Phil Bonacich’s review of Watts, Barabasi, Social Networks. GN05
7. COMPUTER
NETWORKS ARE SOCIAL NETWORKS (Feb 15)
Caroline
Haythornthwaite and Barry Wellman. 1998. "Work, Friendship and Media Use
in a Networked Organization,"
Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(2): 1101-1114. UTL
Barry Wellman.
2001. "Computer Networks as Social Networks." Science 293 (Sept 14):
2031-34. UTL
Anabel Quan-Haase and Barry Wellman, 2002. “Capitalizing on the Internet: Network Capital, Participatory Capital, and Sense of Community.” In Wellman & Haythornthwaite.
http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/~wellman/publications/capitalizingonnet/capitalizingnet.pdf
Keith Hampton and
Barry Wellman. 2003.
"Neighboring in Netville" City
and Community 2 (3): 277-311.
http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/~wellman/publications/neighboring/neighboring_netville.pdf
Caroline Haythornthwaite, 2002. “Strong, Weak, and
Latent Ties and the Impact of New Media.” The Information Society 18:
385-401. UTL
8. ORGANIZATIONAL NETWORKS (March 1)
Peter Monge and
Noshir Contractor. 2000. “Emergence of Communication Networks.” In Handbook of Organizational Communication, 2d
ed. edited by Peter Monge and Noshir Contractor. (long - skim)
Joel Podolny and
James Baron. 1997. “Social Networks and Mobility in the Workplace.” American Sociological Review 62, 5
(Oct): 673-93. UTL
Ronald Burt,
"Structural Holes versus Network Closure as Social Capital." Pp.
31-56 in Lin, Cook & Burt. GN05
Ronald Burt. 2002.
“Bridge Decay.” Social Networks 24 (October): 333-64. UTL
Anabel Quan-Haase and Barry Wellman. 2005.
Hyperconnected Net Work: Computer Mediated Community in a High-Tech
Organization.” Forthcoming in Collaborative Community in Business and Society, edited by Charles Heckscher and Paul Adler.
New York: Oxford University Press.
http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/~wellman/publications/trust/trust3f1.pdf
Rob Cross,
"More Than an Answer: How Seeking Information Through People Facilitates
Knowledge Creation." Presented to the Academy
of Management conference, Toronto, 2000.
9.
INTERORGANIZATIONAL Networks (March 8)
Mark Mizruchi
& Joseph Galaskiewicz, "Networks of Interorganizational
Relations," Sociological Methods
& Research 22, 1 (8/93): 46-70.
UTL
Mark Granovetter.
1985. "Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of
Embeddedness." American Journal of
Sociology 91: 481-510. (Somewhat condensed version in Wellman &
Berkowitz) UTL
Brian Uzzi. 1996.
"The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance
of Organizations: The Network Effect." American
Sociological Review 6: 674-698. UTL
Melissa Schilling & Corey Phelps, "Interfirm
Knowledge Networks and Knowledge Creation: The Impact of 'Small World'
Connectivity." October 2003. Working paper.
10.DATA GATHERING
METHODS (March 15)
Peter Marsden and
Karen Campbell. "Measuring Tie Strength." Social Forces 63 (12/84): 482-501.
UTL
Nan Lin, Yang-chih
Fu, and Ray-May Hsung, "The Position Generator: Measurement Techniques for
Investigations of Social Capital." Pp. 57-81 in Lin, Cook and Burt. GN05
Bonnie Nardi.,
Steve Whittaker and Heinrich Schwartz. 2000. "It's Not What You Know, It's
Who You Know: Work in the Information Age." First Monday 5 (5): http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue5_5/nardi/index.html
Selected papers from forthcoming Field Methods issue
Other papers, tba
11. DATA ANALYSIS (March 22): Guest Seminar Leader:
Prof Dean Behrens
UCINet,
Pajek and Net Draw – hands on experience
Dean Behrens, “A
Walk Through UCINet.” Working paper. – To be provided.
Christoph Müller, Barry Wellman and Alexandra
Marin. “How to Use SPSS to Study Ego-Centered Networks.” Bulletin de Methode
Sociologique 69 (Oct, 1999):
83-100.
http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/~wellman/publications/howtousespss/article.html
James Coleman and Herbert Menzel, “Diffusion
of Innovation among Physicians,” Sociometry 20:
253-70, UTL -paired with:
Ronald Burt, “Social Contagion and
Innovation.” American
Journal of Sociology
92: 1287-1335. UTL
12. WRITING WORKSHOP (April 1)
Same place; but
Friday morning.
For best results,
supply portions of a paper ahead of time.
13. PRESENTATIONS OF PRELIMINARY RESEARCH PAPERS
(April 5)
Powerpoint
presentations